The Influence of Social Value Orientation, Community Engagement, and Innovation Agility on Social Based Organization Growth in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i2.1175Keywords:
Social-Based Organization, Social Value Orientation, Community Engagement, Innovation Agility, Organizational GrowthAbstract
This study investigates the influence of Social Value Orientation, Community Engagement, and Innovation Agility on the growth of Social-Based Organizations (SBOs) in Indonesia. Using a quantitative, explanatory research design, data were collected from 185 organizational leaders representing various SBOs across multiple sectors. The data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results reveal that all three constructs have a significant and positive impact on organizational growth. Community Engagement emerged as the most influential factor, highlighting the importance of participatory practices and stakeholder involvement in program success and sustainability. Social Value Orientation was also found to play a vital role by reinforcing ethical decision-making and prosocial behavior, which enhance trust and long-term legitimacy. Innovation Agility contributes to growth by enabling organizations to respond adaptively to changing societal needs. These findings suggest that a synergistic combination of internal values, community collaboration, and adaptive capabilities is essential for driving sustainable growth in SBOs. The study contributes to the literature on social enterprise development and offers practical insights for strengthening organizational strategy in the nonprofit sector.
References
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.
Chaskin, R. J. (2009). Toward a theory of community capacity building. International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 16(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.12.002
Checkoway, B. (2001). Strengthening democracy through community capacity building. Community Development Journal, 36(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/36.2.141
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7
Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533196
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
