Consensus-Based Pricing Model for Professional Services: A Legal and Technological Approach in Indonesia

Authors

  • Nanin Koeswidi Astuti Faculty of Law, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v7i2.1536

Keywords:

Professional Services, Consensus-Based Pricing Model, Freedom Of Contract, Competition Law, Co-Regulation, Consumer Protection

Abstract

The digital economy has significantly expanded professional service transactions in Indonesia; however, no established mechanism currently provides a reliable benchmark for determining fair service fees. This gap has contributed to price disparities, information asymmetry, and unequal bargaining power between service providers and clients. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing professional service pricing, assess the compatibility of a consensus-based pricing model with competition law principles, and develop a conceptual Consensus-Based Pricing Model. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings demonstrate that the proposed model does not constitute price fixing, as it merely provides a transparent, non-binding, and informative pricing benchmark while preserving the parties' freedom to negotiate the final price. By leveraging digital platforms through a co-regulatory approach, the model has the potential to reduce information asymmetry, strengthen consumer protection and legal certainty, and promote fair market competition.

References

Aini, Q. (2021). Analysis Of The Comparative Islamic Economic Thinking Between Abu Yusuf, Ibnu Taimiyah And Ibnu Khaldun. Dinar : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 8(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.21107/dinar.v8i1.10961

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

Arya, K., Alexander, C. M., Ridho, M., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2026, February 8). Analytical Technology Infrastructure and Decision Making Efficiency in the Retail Sector. 2026 8th International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCBI69404.2026.11496165

Astuti, N. K. (2026). A Non-Coercive Leasing Debt Enforcement Model: Reconceptualizing Compliance through Blockchain-Based Systems. POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI), 5(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v5i1.2147

Astuti, N. K., Sukarmi, S., Suhariningsih, S., & Hamidah, S. (2024). Exploring The Essence of Indonesian Securities-Based Crowdfunding. International Journal of Law in Changing World, 3(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v3i1.81

Atika, E., & Devi, S. (2026). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Pekerjaan Struktur Rumah Tinggal berdasarkan AHSP 2025. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 3(2). https://manggalajournal.org/index.php/cendekia

Atmojo, R. N. P., & Fuad, F. (2023). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Konsumen Pemegang Aset Kripto di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(2), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i2.260

Chenavaz, R. Y., & Dimitrov, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence and dynamic pricing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Applied Economics, 28(1), 2466140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2025.2466140

Darrough, M. N., & Stoughton, N. M. (1986). Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Question of Financial Structure. The Journal of Finance, 41(2), 501–513.

Elargo, A. R., Gamiri, B., Jodin, G. P., Atmojo, R. N. P., & Lie, Y. (2017). Design of BYOD Food Ordering and Delivery Application System at Padang Food Restaurant. Far East Journal of Electronics and Communications, 17(5), 1243–1251. https://doi.org/10.17654/EC017051243

Fakhri, M., Romadhon, M., Nurtasya, M. S., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2026). Sustainable Development in E-Commerce: Assessing the Influence of E-WoM, Structural Assurances, Online Trust, and Reliability on Customer Satisfaction. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10898-2_39

Hakim, M. A. (2015). Peran Pemerintah Dalam Mengawasi Mekanisme Pasar Dalam Perspektif Islam. Iqtishadia, 8(1).

Koeswidi Astuti, N. (2026). Reconceptualizing Legal Entity Structures for Indonesian Commercial Crowdfunding. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 7(1), 116–141. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v7i1.1336

Kurniadi, E., Martin, N., Rubianto, R., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2023, December). Key Drivers for Customer Retention in the Adoption of Online Mutual Fund Applications in Indonesia. 2023 International Conference on Information Technology and Computing (ICITCOM), Yogyakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITCOM60176.2023.10442539

Leonard, A. E., Verenita, F., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2025). Sustainable Infrastructure Optimization in Indonesia Using Sudoku Algorithms. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1488(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012072

Mahendrawati, N. L. M. (2021). Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in Indonesia: A Legal Mechanism to Balance the Public Interest. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.120

Mahsin, & Mansar, A. (2026). Legal Analysis of the Acquittal Verdict in the Amsal Sitepu Case: Implications for Legal Remedies within the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA), 5(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16416

Oktaviandi, M. R., & Yogi. (2024). Economic Justice Through Al-Hisbah: Reviewing The Role And Performance Of Market Supervisory Institutions. Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/kharaj.v6i1.5022

Oktaviani, R., Lusiana, L., & Rafie, R. (2025). Utilizing the AHSP Method for Cost Estimation in Road Improvement at Jalan Parit Demang. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 24(4), 1514–1522. https://doi.org/10.26418/jts.v24i4.86435

Priyono, E. A., Akinrinde, O. O., & Azhar, M. (2026). Digital Transformation of Contract Law: Legal Certainty and Human Rights Protection in AI-Based Contracts. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 8(1).

Spann, M., Bertini, M., Koenigsberg, O., Zeithammer, R., Aparicio, D., Chen, Y., Fantini, F., Jin, G. Z., Morwitz, V. G., Popkowski Leszczyc, P., Vitorino, M. A., Williams, G. Y., & Yoo, H. (2026). Algorithmic pricing: Implications for marketing strategy and regulation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 43(2), 560–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.05.001

Ventura, A. F. A., Decourt, R. F., & Macagnan, C. B. (2026). Corporate Governance in Brazil and Opportunistic Behavior in the Use of Insider Information. Risks, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks14010017

Zhang, Y. F. (2024). Too little or too much transparency? Influencing accountability in project management through the practices of using digital technologies. International Journal of Project Management, 42(6), 102636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102636

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

How to Cite

Koeswidi Astuti, N. (2026). Consensus-Based Pricing Model for Professional Services: A Legal and Technological Approach in Indonesia. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 7(2), 1473-1499. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v7i2.1536